top of page
Purple Petri Dishes

Peer Review Process and Publication Timeline

The peer review process at the International Journal of Science and Innovation is a structured system where submitted research is evaluated by editors and expert reviewers to ensure quality, accuracy, and scientific relevance. Authors receive feedback and may revise their work before a final publication decision is made.

Submission to Publication Timeline

Standard Workflow

Once a manuscript is submitted, it progresses through several stages:

  • Editorial Screening (1–2 weeks):
    The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for scope, formatting, originality, and overall suitability.

  • Peer Review Phase (~8 weeks):
    Qualified reviewers conduct an in-depth scientific assessment of the work.

  • Revision Stage (Author-dependent):
    Authors address reviewer comments and resubmit revised versions.

  • Re-evaluation (~4 weeks):
    Revised manuscripts are reviewed again to ensure all concerns have been adequately addressed.

  • Final Production (1–2 weeks):
    Accepted papers undergo copyediting, formatting, and publication.

​

Peer Review Structure

At International Journal of Science and Innovation, we follow a structured multi-level review system designed to ensure both scientific rigor and educational value.

​

Stage 1: Editorial Assessment

Each submission is first examined by the editorial team to verify:

  • Alignment with journal scope

  • Compliance with submission guidelines

  • Baseline scientific quality

Manuscripts may either proceed to peer review or be declined at this stage.

​

Stage 2: Expert Evaluation

Eligible manuscripts are assigned to one or more subject-matter experts, including:

  • Graduate researchers

  • Postdoctoral scholars

  • Industry or academic professionals

Reviewers evaluate:

  • Scientific validity

  • Methodology

  • Novelty and impact

  • Clarity of presentation

 

Stage 3: Advisory Board Review

A member of the journal’s advisory board—comprising experienced scientists and faculty—provides an additional layer of evaluation and constructive feedback to ensure high publication standards.

 

Editorial Decisions

Following the review process, authors receive one of the following outcomes:

  • Accept: Ready for publication with minimal or no revisions

  • Minor Revisions: Small improvements required before acceptance

  • Major Revisions: Substantial revisions needed; manuscript will undergo re-review

  • Reject: Not suitable for publication in its current form

 

Revision and Resubmission

Authors are provided with detailed reviewer feedback to strengthen their work.

  • Revised submissions are re-evaluated (typically within ~4 weeks)

  • Acceptance is granted only after all reviewer concerns are satisfactorily addressed

 

Final Publication

Once accepted:

  • Manuscripts undergo professional editing and formatting

  • Proofreading is completed by the editorial team

  • Articles are published online within approximately 1–2 weeks

​

Proportion of SubmissionsDecision Time

Average / Median~8 weeks

~66% of papers~10 weeks

~75% of papers~11 weeks

~95% of papers~14 weeks

​

Timelines may vary depending on submission volume and revision requirements.

​

Expedited Review Option

For authors requiring faster decisions, a priority review pathway is available.

  • Initial Decision Timeline: ~2 weeks

  • Fee: $260

  • Scope: Applies only to the first review cycle

Key Points

  • Maintains the same rigorous review standards

  • Uses priority reviewer assignment and scheduling

  • Does not guarantee acceptance

  • Revised submissions follow the standard timeline (~4 weeks)

Request Process

To request expedited review, authors should contact the editorial office with:

  • Subject line: “Expedited Review Request”

  • Manuscript title

  • Author details and submission email

 

Commitment to Quality

The International Journal of Science and Innovation is committed to maintaining a fair, transparent, and constructive peer review process. Each submission is evaluated with the goal of not only ensuring publication quality but also supporting authors in strengthening their scientific work.

bottom of page